It’s been a while since I last wrote a blog but this particular issue has been niggling away at me.
I’m not much of a runner, any twitter followers will know that I play for Sonning Hockey Club and the most weekends hit the badminton court with some older comrades from the Labour Party. Next month I’m running the 5k Pretty Muddy Race for Life, at which point (all being well) I will join a long line of distance running Labour Councillors such as John Ennis and Matt Rodda. Besides being a generally good thing to do, my interest in charity fundraising has been encouraged by the increasingly brutal cuts forced on to the third sector by this government.
The National Council for Voluntary Organisations reported earlier this month that charities had lost over 1.3 billion pounds in the most recent spending cuts. At a local level charities will lose a significant 43% of their funding as a result of budget restrictions passed on by local councils. I am pleased to say however that in Reading at least, the Labour led council decided to protect the third sector budget.
Charities have a long history of supporting our public services and in many cases providing them. Direct cuts to the public and third sector are giving the green light to outsourcing and privatisation.
Over the holidays, Cameron claimed that Jesus invented big society and that he and his party were continuing that good work. Personally, I fail to see how cuts which disproportionately affect impoverished communities, disabled people and other vulnerable groups could possibly be a realisation of this.
The problem is that whether the cuts hit mental health, homeless provision or women’s charities, the end result is always the same. These cuts cost lives.
And naturally, here comes the fundraising plug:
This week Boris Johnson decided to show his true Conservative colours in a speech at the Centre for Policy Studies. Apparently greed is good and low IQs are bad.
Having viewed his speech, which you can see here. Boris makes it clear that those lacking in ‘raw ability’ may actually also be less valuable in terms of ‘spiritual worth’. He argues that we should do more in society to support those with high IQs and disregards other factors which hinder progress up the capitalist ladder. We live in a society where women earn on average 15% less than men due to the gender pay gap, a figure that increases to over 19% in the private sector and 21% for women of colour. Where disabled people are twice as likely to live in poverty and individuals with foreign sounding names are less likely to find employment. We also live in a country where 50% of young Black men are out of work and ‘gay’ is the number one playground insult.
If that wasn’t enough to hamper success for all but the pale, stale males, class can limit your access to educational opportunities, your exposure to the types of language, behaviour and culture highly valued by the elite (obviously not a problem if you went to Eton). Boris notes that “16% of our ‘species’ have an IQ below 85, 2% have an IQ above 130″. Before I could even contemplate his ignorance of disability, the subjectivity of IQ tests and disturbing dehumanisation of many hard working people in low paid work, I simply had to question Boris’ IQ as he progressed this obscure argument into a metaphor about cornflakes.
Perhaps Labour MP Nia Griffith said it best when she exclaimed that ‘”the buffoon’s mask comes off”. What lies beneath the surface of Boris’ comical exterior is a deep seated desire to segregate and demean poorly paid and less educated members of our society. Whilst the Mayor of London praises those scampering away with money at the top, families will be rehoused over Christmas, elderly members of the population will be unable to afford heating bills and food banks will be stretched to the limit. It’s a strange thing to suggest greed is preferable in a country where 3.5 million children (that’s over a quarter of children in the UK) are living below the poverty line. One has to question the spiritual worth of a man who would support that.
If this is the potential future leadership of the Conservative Party, then it is even more imperative that we step up to the plate and return a Labour government in 2015.
Sources: Guardian, Scope, TUC, Stonewall, Office for National Statistics.
On Tuesday, I was asked to speak to Labour Students at the University of Reading.
Being 25, a (fairly) recent graduate living in a house share and someone still paying off their student loan, I can identify with the issues that students and young people are facing.
I talked about my journey through politics which started at Leeds University Union after a challenge from a friend spurred me to stand for Union Council. This was the time that I first got involved with the Labour Party and after that I progressed to a full time officer, the National Executive Council of NUS and Young Members’ Officer of my local UNISON branch. I was fortunate that my introduction to politics came early on and that I had a supportive, engaging environment to learn in but so many miss that chance. The Labour Party has a key role to play in giving people, particularly young people, that voice and I’m keen to be a part of that in Reading.
What followed was an engaging debate about barriers, from student debt to unemployment, an unaffordable housing market and this government’s attack on education maintenance allowance and youth support. There are many reasons why young people disengage.
I’m looking forward to working with the Reading Labour Students in the coming weeks and months. Last month, I also went to Reclaim the Night London with London Young Labour.
The truth is that young people are the future of our movement and it is our responsibility to develop and encourage them. I’m going to do everything possible to get more young people involved in the Reading Labour Party.